ANOTHER MISLEADING STATEMENT FROM THE OPPONENTS OF A LOGICAL SOLUTION TO GLOBAL WARMING AND CLIMATE CHANGE.

REPUBLICANS IN THE US "WE HAVE TO BRING DOWN PRICES. OPEN UP ALL THE ENERGY PRODUCTION RESTRICTIONS."

THE NEW ENERGY WILL BE VERY COSTLY. THERE WILL BE EXPLORATION GRANTS FROM THE US GOVERNMENT. THE CREATION OF NEW GAS AND OIL WELLS WILL HAVE TO BEAR COSTS AT TODAY'S HIGHER THAN EVER PRICES.

THE ONLY ANSWER IS TO RESTRICT CONSUMPTION OF GAS AND OIL AND COAL. BECAUSE THE EXISTING INFRASTRUCTURE COST LESS THAN NEW PRODUCTION FACILITIES WOULD COST, PRESENT DAY PRICES COULD BE REDUCED IF DEMAND FOR FOSSIL FUELS DIMINISHED. THE LESSER CONSUMPTION WOULD BENEFIT OUR ENVIRONMENT WHILE INCREASED PRODUCTION WOULD ADD TO THE CARBON DIOXIDE INDUCED  GLOBAL WARMING CLIMATE CHANGE. 

  

WASTE NO ENERGY.

THE INSULATING BLANKET OF GASSES WHICH  ARE A BY PRODUCT OF ANY COMBUSTION IS HIGHER THAN EVER IN CARBON DIOXIDE GAS, WHICH IS THE MOST EFFECTIVE RETAINER AND RE-RADIATOR OF THE HEAT OF THE EARTH.

KEEP YOUR OLD CLOTHES a blog from LINDON COLLARD

I BOUGHT THESE SHIRTS 33 YEARS AGO. MY AUNT ANNETTE GAVE ME $1000 TO BUY CLOTHES. MY HOUSE WAS BURNED DOWN IN 1980 AND I STILL HAD NO CLOTHES, ONE PAIR OF SHOES AND I ALWAYS DROVE $500 TO $900 CARS. I HAD MY HOUSE WHICH MY HORRIBLE SIBLING FAMILY AND MY WIFE HAD PUT ME INTO DEBT OVER SO I DID NOT REALLY OWN IT. 

THE UPPER SHIRT WAS USED 500 TIMES, WASHED OVER AND OVER,  AND THE LOWER SHIRT ONLY A FEW DOZEN TIMES.

BOTH SHIRTS ARE STILL PERFECTLY SERVICEABLE ALTHOUGH THERE ARE HOLES IN THE HEAVILY USED ONE FROM SNAGGING IT WHILE I WORKED.

I HAVE THE HEAVILY USED ONE ON NOW. I HAVE A NUMBER OF SIMILAR SHIRTS MY SONS WERE DISCARDING. ONLY A FEW OF THEM FEEL AS NICE AS THE COTTON SHIRTS FROM MANY YEARS AGO. THIS SAVES MONEY. IT IS ALSO A VERY GOOD ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY AS NONE OF MY OLD, STILL IN USE, SHIRTS HAVE ENDED UP IN A LANDFILL.

THE ONLY WAY TO CURB CLIMATE CHANGE IS TO STOP THE CONSTANT EXPANSION OF THE ECONOMY.

THE EMPHASIS OF GOVERNMENT MUST BE UPON SUSTAINABILITY. THE ONLY WAY I CAN SEE TO DO THIS IS TO KEEP OUR SOCIETY FUNCTIONING WHILE WE CUT BACK ON THE USE OF MATERIALS AND ENERGY. 

EVERY BIT OF ENERGY USED BECOMES MORE GLOBAL WARMING AND THERE IS  ASSOCIATED ENVIRONMENTAL DAMAGE CAUSED BY THE EMISSIONS FROM THE PRODUCTION OF ENERGY.

NEARLY EVERYTHING WE MAKE FROM RAW MATERIALS BECOMES GARBAGE.

THE EARTH IS BEING EXPOSED TO MORE AND MORE WAR CAUSED ENVIRONMENTAL DAMAGE.

 

STOP WARRING.STOP ALL FIGHTING. THE EARTH CANNOT TOLERATE ANY MORE DESTRUCTION, FUEL BURNING AND REBUILDING.

 

WAR CAUSES ENVIRONMENTAL DAMAGE AND CLIMATE CHANGE.

 

THE FUEL CONSUMPTION OF NAVIES AND ARMIES AND AIR FORCES AND THE NOXIOUS RELEASE OF BURNT ORDINANCE AND FUEL BY ROCKETS CREATES LARGE AMOUNTS OF CO2 AND OXIDIZED NITROGEN AND OTHER HARMFUL GASSES.

THE DESTRUCTION OF INFRASTRUCTURE AND THE REBUILDING THEREOF RESULTS IN A ZERO WIN AND THERE IS A TOTAL LOSS TO THE ENVIRONMENT, OUR BIOSPHERE, AND THE ECONOMY OF THE VICTIMS OF WAR.

STOP WARRING.STOP ALL FIGHTING. THE EARTH CANNOT TOLERATE ANY MORE DESTRUCTION, FUEL BURNING AND REBUILDING.

 

WAR CAUSES ENVIRONMENTAL DAMAGE AND CLIMATE CHANGE.

 

THE FUEL CONSUMPTION OF NAVIES AND ARMIES AND AIR FORCES AND THE NOXIOUS RELEASE OF BURNT ORDINANCE AND FUEL BY ROCKETS CREATES LARGE AMOUNTS OF CO2 AND OXIDIZED NITROGEN AND OTHER HARMFUL GASSES.

THE DESTRUCTION OF INFRASTRUCTURE AND THE REBUILDING THEREOF RESULTS IN A ZERO WIN AND THERE IS A TOTAL LOSS TO THE ENVIRONMENT, OUR BIOSPHERE, AND THE ECONOMY OF THE VICTIMS OF WAR.

WAR CAUSES ENVIRONMENTAL DAMAGE AND CLIMATE CHANGE.

 

THE FUEL CONSUMPTION OF NAVIES AND ARMIES AND AIR FORCES AND THE NOXIOUS RELEASE OF BURNT ORDINANCE AND FUEL BY ROCKETS CREATES LARGE AMOUNTS OF CO2 AND OXIDIZED NITROGEN AND OTHER HARMFUL GASSES.

THE DESTRUCTION OF INFRASTRUCTURE AND THE REBUILDING THEREOF RESULTS IN A ZERO WIN AND THERE IS A TOTAL LOSS ENVIRONMENTALLY.